Saya Gold Avenue AOA has formally expressed strong objections to recent administrative decisions issued by the Ghaziabad Development Authority (GDA) and the Deputy Registrar. Specifically, the Apartment Owners Association alleged that authorities acted with extreme haste based on one-sided complaints without granting a fair hearing. Furthermore, the managing body claimed that officials failed to examine foundational registration documents, bylaws, and general body meeting records before issuing directives.
Allegations of unilateral action and freezing of bank accounts
The most critical issue involves the sudden freezing of the official AOA bank account, which threatens daily community operations. Additionally, association leaders alleged that executing such harsh punitive steps without verified proof of financial irregularities violates core principles of natural justice. Consequently, residents fear that essential services such as security, lift maintenance, water supply, and electricity for 1620 families could suffer severe disruptions.
| Administrative Action Parameter | Official AOA Stance and Details |
| Targeted Residential Society | Saya Gold Avenue, Indirapuram, Ghaziabad |
| Total Impacted Families | 1620 households dependent on daily society upkeep |
| Contested Authorities | Ghaziabad Development Authority (GDA) & Deputy Registrar |
| Core Grievance | Unilateral bank account freeze without fair hearing |
| Contested Letters Dated | October 28 to November 4, 2026 |
Furthermore, association representatives noted that official government correspondence contains no final order canceling their legal registration status. Therefore, the managing committee has expressed complete readiness to submit necessary compliance documents and factual records in response to official notices.
Personal vendetta allegations and demand for fairness
Moreover, the managing committee alleged that the ongoing controversy stems from personal vendettas and individual vested interests. Specifically, certain disgruntled individuals failed to secure management roles or preferred memberships, prompting them to file repeated malicious complaints. Furthermore, association leaders emphasized that personal ambitions must never override the collective welfare of 1620 resident families.
| Dispute Aspect | Association Perspective & Demands |
| Motivation Allegations | Personal malice from individuals denied management positions |
| Audit Stance | Welcomes independent audits and transparent statutory investigations |
| Primary Demand | Equal opportunity and unbiased review of all factual records |
| Legal Posture | Reserves all statutory remedies to protect residents’ rights |
Meanwhile, the management committee reiterated that they welcome independent audits, financial transparency, and statutory investigations. However, authorities must provide both complainants and affected representatives an equal opportunity to present evidence.
